I have one comment on these files.  I calculated PL (item 75) and PLTH
(item 76) as follows.

PL = POHM + PNBI - DWTOT
PLTH = POHM + PNBI - DWTOT - PFLOSS,

where

PFLOSS = P_ORBIT + P_RIPPLE + P_CX.

Here P_ORB, P_RIPPLE and P_CX are calculate by OFMC (Orbit Following
Monte-Carlo) code.  The calculation by OFMC is carried out on the
assumption that the background parameters (density and temperature) does
not change, i.e. steady-state calculation  All the test particles are
traced until all of them are fully thermalized or lost during the
thermalization process.  Actually there is a finite slowing down time of
fast ions, especially in the high ion temperature plasma such as 16168. 
Therefore PLTH does not indicate the absorbed power by electrons and ions
at the specific time.  

     In the paper of H-mode workshop, I evaluated the time evolution of
absorbed power by using 1-d Fokker-Planck equation and use the fraction of
fast ion losses such as the orbit loss, the ripple loss and the charge
exchange loss as the correction factor.  So the P_net used in this paper is
different from PLTH in the database.


Hiroshi SHIRAI

(Office)
Plasma Analysis Division
Department of Fusion Plasma Research
Naka Fusion Research Establishment
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
Naka-machi, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 311-01
Japan
Tel  : (81) 29-270-7352
Fax : (81) 29-270-7419

shirai@expert1.naka.jaeri.go.jp